Famitsu review scores Viractal and Qliphah in Providence’s Shadow
Famitsu published reviews of Viractal and Qliphah in Providence’s Shadow for the week of October 4, 2026. Four editors reviewed each game, with final scores calculated out of 40 points.
Famitsu published review scores for Viractal and Qliphah in Providence’s Shadow in its review roundup for the week of October 4, 2026.
Four editors reviewed each game. Famitsu’s final score uses a 40-point scale.
Viractal blends board game and roguelike
Reviewers described Viractal as a fantasy RPG with procedurally generated stages, deck building and control of multiple characters. Each adventure lasts 25 turns and ends with a battle against a giant boss.
The reviews also highlighted local and online multiplayer, co-op play and strong replay value. However, sessions can run long, events may feel repetitive, and the Will resource limits access to more powerful cards.
Qliphah focuses on counterattacks
Qliphah in Providence’s Shadow uses real-time command battles built around counters, time-slowing functions and varied skill builds. Its interface assigns the two characters’ controls to the left and right sides of the controller.
Editors praised the flashy battles, visual presentation and slow-motion replay feature for players less familiar with action games. Criticism focused on the more monotonous exploration, chaotic encounters with multiple enemies and the difficult balance between action-oriented combat and an interface that encourages repeated attack inputs.
What we know
- Famitsu published scores for Viractal and Qliphah in Providence’s Shadow for the week of October 4, 2026.
- Four editors reviewed each game using a final scale of up to 40 points.
- Viractal features a 25-turn adventure with procedural stages, deck building and a final boss battle.
- Qliphah in Providence’s Shadow uses real-time combat built around counters and time-slowing mechanics.
Trust: Single source
- The story relies on one publisher. A second independent confirmation has not been established from the cited sources.
- Cited links: 1. Publisher groups: 1. Sources: Nintendo Everything.
- This describes the available source evidence, not a probability of truth or a claim of manual editorial review.
View sources1
COMMUNITY
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Start the discussion.